In which case was the right to legal representation emphasized, particularly concerning adequate funding for legal counsel?

The right to legal representation, along with the necessity of adequate funding for legal counsel, was emphasized in the case of Dietrich v The Queen. In this landmark decision, the High Court of Australia established that a fair trial cannot occur without legal representation for an accused, especially in serious criminal cases where the defendant faces significant penalties. The court highlighted that the government has an obligation to ensure that an accused person can access legal advice and representation, particularly to maintain the integrity of the legal system and the rights of individuals under trial.

This case brought attention to the challenges of self-representation and the injustices that can arise when individuals cannot afford legal counsel. While it directly addressed the issue of rights related to representation, other options presented may involve legal principles but do not focus as significantly on the necessity for adequate funding for legal counsel in the context of ensuring fair trials.