In which case was the concept of 'unreasonable and excessive' self-defense discussed?

The concept of 'unreasonable and excessive' self-defense was notably discussed in The Queen v Brown. In this case, the court explored the limits of self-defense, particularly focusing on when self-defense can be deemed unreasonable or excessive in relation to the threat posed. The ruling emphasized that self-defense must be proportional to the perceived threat, and any actions taken that exceed what is reasonable in the situation could lead to legal consequences.

In the context of self-defense claims, the court's discussion highlighted the necessity for a careful assessment of the circumstances surrounding the defensive acts. This case ultimately helped to clarify legal standards regarding acceptable levels of force in self-defense situations.

Other cases presented do not primarily focus on the concept of 'unreasonable and excessive' self-defense in the same way. For example, R v Katarzynski, Viro v The Queen, and R v White might discuss self-defense but do not delve deeply into the nuances of unreasonable or excessive force as determined in The Queen v Brown. By establishing a precedent in this particular context, The Queen v Brown remains a significant reference point in legal discussions surrounding self-defense.