What is the difference between direct evidence and circumstantial evidence?

The distinction between direct evidence and circumstantial evidence lies in how each type of evidence establishes facts. Direct evidence provides straightforward proof that directly supports a conclusion. For instance, a witness who sees a crime occur offers direct evidence of that crime, as their testimony recounts firsthand knowledge of events.

In contrast, circumstantial evidence does not directly prove a fact but instead allows an inference to be drawn. It consists of information or clues that, when pieced together, can suggest a particular scenario or truth, such as someone's motive, opportunity, or behavior. For example, if someone is found near the scene of a crime with stolen items, it creates a circumstantial case that they may have committed the theft, but it does not prove it outright without additional context or evidence.

Understanding this fundamental difference is crucial, as it helps in evaluating the strength and implications of various pieces of evidence in legal cases.