What type of evidence was ruled inadmissible in the Cheryl Grimmer murder case?

In the Cheryl Grimmer murder case, the evidence that was ruled inadmissible was unlawfully obtained evidence. This refers to any evidence that has been obtained in a manner that violates a person's legal rights, such as through coercion, without proper warrants, or without the necessary consent. The legal system emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural and constitutional standards to protect individuals from unlawful search and seizure.

When evidence is obtained unlawfully, it undermines the integrity of the judicial process, and courts often exclude such evidence to ensure that trials remain fair and just. This principle is rooted in the exclusionary rule, which aims to deter police misconduct and uphold the rights of the accused. In the context of the Grimmer case, ruling such evidence as inadmissible helped maintain the integrity of the judicial proceedings and protect due process rights.

Other types of evidence, like witness statements, expert testimony, or video evidence, are typically admissible unless they also breach legal standards or procedural protocols. Therefore, the ruling concerning unlawfully obtained evidence reflects a broader principle in criminal law about the need for lawful procedures in gathering evidence.