Which case established that evidence can be deemed inadmissible if it does not meet specific criteria regarding the expert's knowledge?

The correct answer is Honeysett v The Queen, a significant case that highlights the criteria for admitting expert evidence in legal proceedings. In this decision, the High Court set forth important guidelines surrounding the qualifications and expertise required for a witness to provide expert testimony.

In particular, the case emphasized that for evidence to be admissible, the witness must demonstrate specialized knowledge that goes beyond the understanding of the average juror. This ensures that the expert's testimony is reliable and relevant to the case at hand. The standards established in this case are crucial for maintaining the integrity of expert evidence in court, as they help prevent unreliable or speculative testimony from swaying a jury's decision.

Other choices do not specifically deal with the standards for expert testimony and its admissibility. Thus, it is Honeysett v The Queen that directly addresses this issue, making it the foundational case for determining the admissibility of expert evidence based on the knowledge of the expert.