Which case involved a principal in the first degree and an accessory after the fact?

R v Stanford is notable for involving both a principal in the first degree and an accessory after the fact. In criminal law, a principal in the first degree is the person who actually commits the crime, while an accessory after the fact assists the principal after the crime has been committed, often by helping them evade capture or conceal evidence. R v Stanford illustrates the roles of different parties in a crime, showcasing how individuals can be charged with distinct but interconnected offenses depending on their involvement. This case highlights the legal principles surrounding parties to a crime, emphasizing the responsibilities and consequences faced by those who participate in criminal acts, whether directly or indirectly.