Which concept refers to the frameworks for fair sentencing?

The concept that refers to the frameworks for fair sentencing is sentencing guidelines. These guidelines provide a structured approach to sentencing by establishing a set of criteria that judges can use to determine appropriate sentences for different offenses. The goal is to promote consistency and fairness in sentencing across similar cases, minimizing the influence of bias or individual discretion.

Sentencing guidelines can incorporate various factors, such as the severity of the crime, the offender's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. These frameworks are designed to ensure that similar offenses receive similar punishments, contributing to the overall integrity of the justice system.

In contrast, the other concepts mentioned—such as determinate sentencing, indeterminate sentencing, and mandatory minimums—focus on different aspects of sentencing but do not establish a framework aimed specifically at achieving fairness across a range of cases. Determinate sentencing involves fixed sentences for specific crimes, while indeterminate sentencing allows for a range of sentences where the actual time served can vary. Mandatory minimums set a minimum penalty for certain offenses, which can limit judicial discretion without providing a comprehensive framework for equitable sentencing across the board.